Dire Straits: The Hormuz Stalemate at Six Months
7 September 2026 The Strait of Hormuz has burned again. On Saturday, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said it had struck three oil tankers and three US-linked vessels in the waterway, in retaliation for fresh American strikes on Iranian tankers earlier the same day, including the crude carrier M/T Kylo. It is the latest exchange in a confrontation that has now run for over six months, since the United States and Israel opened their campaign against Iran on 28 February, and it comes after barely a month of relative calm. We return to this story, as we have done repeatedly over the past six months, not simply because the flashpoint recurs, but because Hormuz has proved itself a genuine barometer for the direction of global trade and finance. Freight rates, insurance premiums, oil and gas prices, and by extension inflation expectations and interest rate decisions worldwide, all take their cue from what happens in this one stretch of water. Few single chokepoints tell you as much, as quickly, about where the global economy is heading. The toll is no longer abstract. The crisis has claimed twenty seafarers and one port worker, with thirty-five more injured; Iran alone struck at least thirteen commercial vessels in August, including a strike on the tanker MT Sidr that killed two crew. Traffic through the Strait, which normally carries around a quarter of the world’s seaborne oil trade and close to a fifth of its liquefied natural gas, remains a fraction of its pre-crisis volume, and increasingly hard to verify: with more vessels switching off their transponders to avoid becoming targets, even Washington’s own figures on daily barrel flows are treated with scepticism by independent maritime analysts. Markets have responded in the only language they know. Brent crude has posted a third straight daily gain, quoted around $79 a barrel by XTB, while broader crude benchmarks tracked by Trading Economics were up roughly nine per cent on the week and trading closer to $91. The World Bank now expects energy prices to surge 24 per cent this year, the sharpest rise since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and overall commodity prices to climb 16 per cent, driven by energy, fertiliser and record metal prices. None of that is contained to the Gulf: it is arriving at exactly the moment the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan are trying to judge whether inflation is beaten or merely resting, with Friday’s US inflation print now doing double duty as a bellwether for both monetary policy and the price of keeping ships moving through Hormuz. Has a resolution become more plausible, or less? The honest answer is: less, for now, though not for want of trying. Delegations from Washington and Tehran did sit down in June around a memorandum of understanding meant to end the war; the Islamabad Talks in the spring produced their own short-lived ceasefire; the two governments have between them stood up a Persian Gulf Strait Authority and an Islamabad Memorandum as embryonic institutional scaffolding; and as recently as 25 August, the US Navy confirmed it had cleared the Strait’s principal shipping lane of more than a hundred suspected mines. Each of these is a genuine, if partial, achievement. But each has also been followed, within weeks, by a fresh exchange of fire, and this weekend’s strikes on tankers and US-linked vessels suggest the underlying dispute, over who controls passage through Hormuz, remains as unresolved as it was in February. That is the real cost of stalemate: not only the lives already lost and the tankers already burned, but a global economy that cannot fully exhale. Insurers cannot fully price Gulf risk while ceasefires keep breaking. Central banks cannot fully relax while a fifth of the world’s LNG and a quarter of its seaborne oil sit hostage to one of the narrowest, most contested shipping lanes on Earth. And companies across the commodities and chemicals trade, ourselves included, cannot plan a “normal” that keeps receding by another month, then another. A durable settlement, whatever shape it eventually takes, is not simply a diplomatic nicety; it is the precondition for the world’s freight rates, feedstock costs and interest rate decisions to return to something like predictability. Until then, the bill for uncertainty keeps being paid, by shipowners, by insurers, by consumers, and by every business that trades across this most contested of waterways. This is the latest in our ongoing coverage of the Strait of Hormuz crisis and its implications for global trade.
The Hidden Cost of Oil: Not Just the Climate – But War Itself
10 March 2026 We talk endlessly about fossil fuels and the environment. We talk rather less about something arguably more urgent: the direct link between hydrocarbon dependency and geopolitical instability. The argument is straightforward, if uncomfortable. So long as the global economy runs on oil and gas, the nations and actors who control supply routes hold the rest of the world to ransom. That is not a metaphor. It is a strategic reality – and Iran has been demonstrating it with considerable precision. The Strait of Hormuz, the narrow chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil passes, has become Tehran’s lever of choice. Drone attacks on tankers, threats to close the strait entirely, the targeting of production infrastructure across the Persian Gulf – these are not random provocations. They are the deliberate weaponisation of energy dependency. When a single nation-state can destabilise global markets, trigger inflationary shockwaves across Europe and threaten the energy security of dozens of countries simultaneously, the political cost of fossil fuel reliance becomes starkly visible. The economic arguments for hydrocarbons have always been well rehearsed: they are energy-dense, relatively cheap, and the existing infrastructure around them is vast. Transition is genuinely hard. But the geopolitical calculus is shifting. OPEC’s grip has loosened, drilling technology has advanced, and new supply sources have emerged. Yet dependency endures – and with it, vulnerability. The climate case for moving beyond oil and gas has been made, repeatedly and compellingly. The security case is equally powerful, and perhaps more immediately persuasive to those who remain unmoved by environmental argument. Every barrel of oil that can be replaced by domestic renewable generation is a barrel that cannot be held hostage. Energy transition is not merely an environmental imperative. It is a peace dividend waiting to be collected.
The Man Who Could Build A House Out of Gold
5 March 2026 Imagine you needed 16,000 kilograms of gold for a construction project. You could call Joy Alukkas. He already has it. The Kerala-born tycoon built one of the world’s largest family-owned jewellers from origins that could hardly be more modest. His father started the first jewellery showroom in 1956 – a modest business in Thrissur, Kerala, with roots not in gold but in umbrella manufacturing and stationery. Joy entered the gold trade as a teenager, helping his father at 14, and never completed his pre-degree education. In 1987, he flew to Abu Dhabi – his first ever flight – with several doubts and questions in his head. What followed was one of the great entrepreneurial stories of the Gulf. Today the Joyalukkas Group spans around 200 stores across the UAE, India, and the US, holding nearly 16,000 kg of gold – jewellery and bars combined. Forbes places his net worth at $4.4 billion, ranking him among the 50 richest people in India. He didn’t get here smoothly. When the Gulf War broke out in 1990, it disrupted everything and forced him back to India – but a resilient Joy returned to the Gulf months later and re-established his footprint. His own account of that journey is characteristically blunt: “My success did not come overnight. There were challenges, but I faced them head-on.” Now he has something important to say about gold itself – and this is where it gets serious. Speaking to Bloomberg in Dubai, Alukkas was clear: “Whenever global tensions rise, people turn to gold as a safe investment, which pushes prices higher.” He added that over the next two to three years, until the US economy and global conditions improve, gold prices are unlikely to see a major decline. He is not alone in that view. J.P. Morgan forecasts gold pushing towards $5,000 per ounce by the fourth quarter of 2026, with $6,000 a possibility longer term, driven by sustained central bank and investor demand. Gold is currently trading at around $5,161 per ounce – up dramatically from $2,639 at the start of 2025. The lesson from the man who holds 16 tonnes of the stuff? In a world of geopolitical fracture, trade wars, military strikes, and dollar anxiety, gold isn’t a relic – it’s a refuge. And the price of that refuge is still rising.
London: The New Crossroads of Trade
A Frozen Bridge for U.S.-China Relations A Welcoming Embrace for India 24th July 2025 As two tectonic shifts in global trade diplomacy unfold in London, the city once again finds itself a crucible for competing visions of globalisation. On one side, a faltering relationship between the United States and China teeters on the edge of renewed hostility, even as both parties prepare for a new round of negotiations. On the other, the arrival of India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi marks the culmination of an ambitious UK-India trade pact, one being hailed as a milestone for post-Brexit Britain. These developments — playing out simultaneously in the same city — offer a revealing snapshot of the state of international trade, diplomacy, and strategic alignment in 2025. A Frozen Bridge for U.S.-China Relations Tensions between the U.S. and China remain acute. Despite a cordial front and public statements calling for “mutual respect” and “win-win cooperation”, trade between the two economic giants has stalled in key sectors. U.S. exports of crude oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and coal to China hit zero last month — a stark indicator of deepening friction. According to Chinese customs data, energy imports from the U.S. began collapsing in March when Beijing imposed retaliatory tariffs of 10–15% in response to American pressure. Washington’s rhetoric has veered between conciliation and brinkmanship. Treasury officials have suggested the relationship is “in a good place”, yet President Trump has issued an ultimatum: reach a deal by 12 August or face even steeper tariffs. With energy trade halted and broader economic trust eroded, negotiations now risk becoming performative rather than productive. Warm Welcome for India In stark contrast, Narendra Modi’s visit to London signals a rare bright spot in international trade. The UK-India trade deal, finalised this week, marks the most significant bilateral agreement for Britain since its departure from the European Union. It promises liberalised trade across goods, digital services, pharmaceuticals, and the movement of skilled labour. Symbolically and strategically, this partnership demonstrates both countries’ pivot away from traditional Atlantic alignments and towards a multipolar future. For India, this is part of a broader push to assert itself as a manufacturing and technological alternative to China. For the UK, the deal is a concrete step in delivering on the promise of “Global Britain” and diversifying supply chains beyond the EU and China. Diplomacy in a Fragmented World The juxtaposition of these two developments in London underscores the shifting tides in global diplomacy. Whereas Cold War-era alignments once dominated the international order, the 21st century is increasingly shaped by regional partnerships, transactional diplomacy, and contested norms of engagement. The China-U.S. standoff reflects a breakdown of trust between the two largest economies, with energy trade — a pillar of past cooperation — now weaponised. Meanwhile, India’s alignment with the UK symbolises a constructive alternative: partnerships built on shared democratic values, strategic interests, and mutual economic gain. Implications for Globalism and Security These contrasting stories also point to diverging models of globalisation. One is increasingly fragmented, shaped by tariffs, coercion, and rivalry. The other is cautiously optimistic, rooted in bilateralism and cooperation among emerging and middle powers. Yet the implications go beyond trade flows. A prolonged breakdown between China and the U.S. risks fuelling economic decoupling, reshaping energy markets, and accelerating the formation of parallel financial systems. Meanwhile, strengthened ties between countries like India and the UK could create new centres of influence, challenging traditional global institutions. London, long a symbol of open markets and internationalism, now hosts both a high-stakes power play and a hopeful handshake. The outcomes of these two engagements will reverberate well beyond the city — shaping not only trade balances, but the future of global diplomacy itself.
🌍 Crude Oil Instability Renews Debate on Energy Strategy
17th June 2025 Volatility in global oil markets has once again come into sharp focus as geopolitical tensions escalate in the Middle East. Crude prices have surged following recent Israeli strikes on Iranian facilities, pushing Brent close to the USD 80 mark—a level widely considered a threshold at which previously uneconomic sources of oil, such as shale and fracked reserves, start to re-enter the conversation. This development comes amid continued energy disruption caused by the war in Ukraine and increasingly fractured relations with Russia. As supply chains are tested and markets jitter, the conversation around energy resilience, security, and strategy is growing ever more urgent. At Gapuma, we remain mindful of the complex and often polarising nature of energy policy, particularly where fossil fuels such as fracked oil and gas are concerned. While fracking remains a subject of intense debate—on environmental, regulatory, and social grounds—what is undeniable is that rising oil prices tend to breathe new life into its economic case. At price points above USD 80 per barrel, advocates of fracking are likely to become more vocal, and investment interest could follow. However, it is essential to situate this debate within a broader strategic context. Short-term responses to supply shocks must not overshadow the longer-term imperative to create a more balanced and sustainable energy mix. Carbon-based fuels—while still an important part of global supply—must gradually yield to lower-emission alternatives that offer both environmental and geopolitical stability. Battery technologies, scalable renewables, green hydrogen, and smart grid infrastructure will all play increasingly pivotal roles in shaping the energy systems of tomorrow. These technologies reduce dependency on volatile imports, enhance domestic energy security, and contribute meaningfully to decarbonisation targets. As political analyst Marwan Bishara noted, “Energy has become the lifeblood of geopolitical power—a single disruption can reshape global alliances.” That reality has been laid bare in both Eastern Europe and the Gulf, and it continues to shape decision-making across boardrooms and governments alike. Reflecting on this moment, Jack Bardakjian, Gapuma’s Group Managing Director, said: “We need to be very judicious in the choices we make today to guarantee our energy security in the medium to longer term.” With the situation in Iran remaining fluid and the risk of further destabilisation high, the pressure on energy markets is likely to persist. Should a leadership vacuum emerge or regional conflict escalate, we could see further strain on oil flows and a renewed push by certain sectors for domestic energy sources, including shale and fracked hydrocarbons. Nonetheless, the long-term trajectory must point toward a healthier, more diversified global energy portfolio—one in which carbon-based fuels represent a smaller share and sustainability plays a greater role in both energy policy and investment decisions. Gapuma remains committed to providing insight and clarity at this critical junction, as markets, policymakers, and partners navigate the path ahead.